Polymer Alloy 2000SD

Environmental Impact

Product Details

Description

Static dissipative, semi-self-leveling novolac epoxy floor topping engineered for electrostatic control. Dissipates stray electrical current to ground in environments requiring ESD protection. Moderate chemical resistance to splash and spillage.

Lifecycle Breakdown

Method: TRACI 2.1 · 6.341463415 kgCO₂e/kg

EPD PDF Document

ENVIRONMENTALPRODUCT DECLARATIONIN ACCORDANCE WITH ISO 14025 AND ISO 21930:2017SmartEPD-2024-039-0177-01Po����r A��o� 2000SDDat� of Issu�:Oct 15, 2024Expiration:Oct 15, 2029Last updat�d:Oct 21, 2024

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.G�n�ra� Infor�ation4R�f�r�nc� Standards4V�rification Infor�ation5Li�itations, Liabi�it�, and Own�rship5Organization Infor�ation5Product Infor�ation5P�ants6Product Sp�cifications6Mat�ria� Co�position6Softwar� and LCI Data Sourc�s7EPD Data Sp�cificit�7R�n�wab�� E��ctricit�7S�st�� Boundar�8Product F�ow Diagra�9Lif� C�c�� Modu�� D�scriptions9LCA Discussion9R�su�ts11Environ��nta� I�pact Ass�ss��nt11R�sourc� Us� Indicators13Wast� and output F�ow Indicators14Carbon E�issions and R��ova�s15Sc�narios16Transport to th� bui�ding/construction sit� (A4)16Insta��ation in to th� bui�ding/construction sit� (A5)16R�f�r�nc� S�rvic� Lif� (B1)16R�p�ac���nt (B4)16Page 2 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.End of Lif� (C1 - C4)17Int�rpr�tation18Additiona� Environ��nta� Infor�ation18R�f�r�nc�s18Page 3 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.G�n�ra� Infor�ation Dudick Inc. 1818 Miller Parkway, Streetsboro, OH 44241800-322-1970sales@dudick.comdudick.co�Product Na��:Polymer Alloy 2000SDFunctiona� Unit:1 m2 of covered and protected flooring surface for a period of 60 yearsD�c�aration Nu�b�r:SmartEPD-2024-039-0177-01Dat� of Issu�:October 15, 2024Expiration:October 15, 2029Last updat�d:October 21, 2024EPD Scop�:Cradle to graveA1 – A3, A4, A5, B1 - B7, C1 - C4 Mark�t(s) of App�icabi�it�:North AmericaR�f�r�nc� StandardsStandard(s): ISO 14025 and ISO 21930:2017PCR:NSF PCR for Resinous Floor Coatings v.1eDate of issue: December 17, 2018Valid until: December 17, 2024PCR r�vi�w pan��:Contact Smart EPD for more information.G�n�ra� Progra� Instructions:Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.1.0, November 2022Page 4 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.V�rification Infor�ationLCA Author/Cr�ator:Juan David Villegasjuan@parqhq.comEPD Progra� Op�rator:Smart EPDinfo@smartepd.comwww.smartepd.com585 Grove St., Ste. 145 PMB 966, Herndon, VA 20170, USAV�rification: Independent critical review of the LCA and data, according to ISO 14044 and ISO 14071 : External Ranjani TheregowdaSmart EPD LLCranjani.theregowda@smartepd.com Independent external verification of EPD, according to ISO 14025 and reference PCR(s) : External Ranjani TheregowdaSmart EPD LLCranjani.theregowda@smartepd.comLi�itations, Liabi�it�, and Own�rshipEnvironmental declarations from different programs (ISO 14025) may not be comparable. Comparison of the environmental performance of products using EPD information shall be based on the product’s use and impacts at the building level, and therefore EPDs may not be used for comparability purposes when not considering the whole building life cycle. EPD comparability is only possible when all stages of a life cycle have been considered. However, variations and deviations are possible. Example of variations: Different LCA software and background LCI datasets may lead to differences results for upstream or downstream of the life cycle stages declared. The EPD owner has sole ownership, liability, and responsibility for the EPD.Organization Infor�ation For over fifty years, Dudick has been at the forefront of delivering cutting-edge product development alongside a wealth of technical expertise and experience, offering unparalleled chemical resistant coating solutions on a global scale. As a notable manufacturer of high performance resinous flooring and other coating products, Dudick is dedicated to showcasing its sustainability leadership while recognizing the business value in transparently reporting the comprehensive environmental impacts of its products, spanning from cradle to grave. For additional details on Dudick's product range, visit their website at https://www.dudick.com. Furth�r infor�ation can b� found at:www.dudick.co�Product D�scription A static dissipative, semi self-leveling novolac epoxy floor topping engineered to instill electrostatic control characteristics. This product uses a moisture-tolerant primer to achieve a strongly bonded monolithic topping with moderate chemical resistance to splash and spillage, and good physical and mechanical properties. Furth�r infor�ation can b� found at:https://www.dudick.co�/products/po����r-a��o�/Product Infor�ationFunctiona� Unit:1 m2 of covered and protected flooring surface for a period of 60 yearsMass:1.64 kgPage 5 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.R�f�r�nc� S�rvic� Lif�:60 YearsProduct Sp�cificit�:Product AverageProduct SpecificP�antsDudick - Streetsboro, OH1818 Miller Parkway, Streetsboro, OH, USAProduct Sp�cificationsProduct SKU(s):260D0766ABXDProduct C�assification Cod�s:Masterformat - 09 67 00EC3 - Finishes -> Flooring -> OtherFlooringMat�ria� Co�positionMaterial/Component CategoryOrigin% MassConductive PigmentUSA20-40%Curing agentUSA10-30%DefoamerUSA<10%Dispersing agentUSA<10%Epoxy resinUSA20-40%PigmentUSA<10%Reactive DiluentUSA0-20%Packaging MaterialOriginkg MassSteel PailUSA0.041Plastic PailUSA0.21Page 6 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.Hazardous MaterialsPolyoxypropylene-2, 10-diamine (9046-10-0)4-tert-Butylphenol (98-54-4)Benzyl alcohol (100-51-6)Isophoronediamine (2855-13-2)Epoxy phenol novolac resin (28064-14-4)Neopentyl diglycidyl ether (17557-23-2)EPD Data Sp�cificit�Pri�ar� Data Y�ar:2022-2023Manufacturing Sp�cificit�:Industry AverageManufacturer AverageFacility SpecificAv�raging:Averaging was not conducted for this EPDSoftwar� and LCI Data Sourc�sLCA Softwar�:SimaPro v. 9.5LCI For�ground Databas�(s):Ecoinvent v. 3.9.1LCI Background Databas�(s):Ecoinvent v. 3.9.1R�n�wab�� E��ctricit�R�n�wab�� ���ctricit� is us�d:NoPage 7 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.S�st�� Boundar�ProductionA1Raw material supplyA2TransportA3ManufacturingConstructionA4Transport to siteA5Assembly / InstallUseB1UseB2MaintenanceB3RepairB4ReplacementB5RefurbishmentB6Operational Energy UseB7Operational Water UseEnd of LifeC1DeconstructionC2TransportC3Waste ProcessingC4DisposalBenefits & Loads Beyond System BoundaryDRecycling, Reuse Recovery PotentialNDPage 8 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.Product F�ow Diagra�Lif� C�c�� Modu�� D�scriptionsPrimary data were collected for the 12 month period starting October 2022 and ending September 2023 to ensure technical, geographical and temporal the representativeness. The products in this study are manufactured at Dudick’s production facilities. The manufacturing process entails the addition of pre-weighted ingredients, followed by mixing in the correct sequence to create the desired products. Subsequently, Dudick packages and distributes the finished products to various distribution centers. The process involves the use of grid electricity, heat from natural gas combustion, an process water. Non hazardous waste consisting mainly of packaging material is sent to disposal or recycling.LCA DiscussionA��ocation Proc�dur�Product packaging was allocated by mass. Allocation of co-products was avoided, to the extent it was possible, based on the guidance given in ISO 14044:2006, 4.3., in ISO 21930 and section 5 of the NSF International PCR for Resinous Floor Coatings. Volumetric allocation was applied to energy and water use at the facility level, as it represents the partition among selling units (using mass or volume production, where appropriate). Dudick, Inc. provided the total volume or mass produced at each facility.Cut-off Proc�dur�No cut-off criteria are defined for this study. The system boundary was defined based on relevance to the goal of the study. For the processes within the system boundary, all available energy and material flow data have been included in the model. In cases where no matching life cycle inventories are available to represent a flow, proxy data have been applied based on conservative assumptions regarding environmental impacts.Page 9 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.Data Qua�it� DiscussionThe quality of inventory data is evaluated based on several criteria, including precision, completeness, consistency, and representativeness.Precision and Completeness- Precision: The inventory data used in this study were either directly measured, calculated, or estimated based on primary data sources, ensuring high precision. Background data from ecoinvent v3.9.1 database also has documented precision to the extent available.- Completeness: The product system's mass balance and inventory completeness were thoroughly checked. Some exclusions were made in line with the PCR requirements, such as personnel impacts, R&D activities, business travel, secondary packaging, point of sale infrastructure, and the coating applicator. However, no data was intentionally omitted..Consistency and Reproducibility- Consistency: Primary data were collected with a similar level of detail, while background data came from the ecoinvent v3.9.1 database. The modeling approach and other methodological choices were applied consistently throughout the model. Default values from the PCR were considered where there was unavailability of primary data.- Reproducibility: This study ensures reproducibility by providing comprehensive disclosure of input-output data, dataset choices, and modeling approaches. A knowledgeable third party should be able to approximate the results using the same data and modeling methods.Representativeness- Temporal: Primary data were collected for the one-year period of October 2022 to September 2023 to ensure the representativeness of post-consumer content. Secondary data from the ecoinvent v3.9.1 database is typically representative of recent years.- Geographical: Primary data represent Dudick's production facilities. Where applicable, differences in electric grid mix were considered using appropriate secondary data. The use of country-specific data ensures high geographical representativeness, and proxy data were only used when country-specific data were unavailable.- Technological: Both primary and secondary data were tailored to the specific technologies studied, ensuring high technological representativeness. Where no direct raw material information was available in the ecoinvent 3.9.1 database, proxies were identified and used.Page 10 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.R�su�tsEnviron��nta� I�pact Ass�ss��nt R�su�tsTRACI 2.1per 1 m2.LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks.MarketI�pact Cat�gor�M�thodUnitA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4GWP-totalTRACI 2.1kg CO2e10.40.5710.257ND0.901ND55.9NDNDNDND0.05990.7136.04ODPTRACI 2.1kg CFC11 eq0.00004199.42e-91.94e-10ND7.36e-8ND0.000209NDNDNDND9.9e-104.87e-94.02e-9APTRACI 2.1kg SO2 eq0.07250.003060.0000778ND0.00489ND0.378NDNDNDND0.0003210.0004670.00166EPTRACI 2.1kg N eq0.02280.0005810.00277ND0.00362ND0.131NDNDNDND0.00006110.0003020.0653POCPTRACI 2.1kg O3 eq1.190.08550.00132ND0.0541ND6.38NDNDNDND0.008990.006150.0261Abbreviations:GWP = Global Warming Potential, 100 years (may also be denoted as GWP-total, GWP-fossil (fossil fuels), GWP-biogenic (biogenic sources), GWP-luluc (land use and land use change)), ODP = Ozone Depletion Potential, AP = Acidification Potential, EP = Eutrophication Potential, SFP = Smog Formation Potential, POCP = Photochemical oxidant creation potential, ADP-Fossil = Abiotic depletion potential for fossil resources, ADP-Minerals&Metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources, WDP = Water deprivation potential, PM = Particular Matter Emissions, IRP = Ionizing radiation, human health, ETP-fw = Eco-toxicity (freshwater), HTP-c = Human toxicity (cancer), HTP-nc = Human toxicity (non-cancer), SQP = Soil quality index.Page 11 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.per 1 m2.TechI�pact Cat�gor�M�thodUnitA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4GWP-totalTRACI 2.1kg CO2e10.40.5710.257ND0.901ND33.5NDNDNDND0.040.4754.03ODPTRACI 2.1kg CFC11 eq0.00004199.42e-91.94e-10ND7.36e-8ND0.000126NDNDNDND6.6e-103.25e-92.68e-9APTRACI 2.1kg SO2 eq0.07250.003060.0000778ND0.00489ND0.227NDNDNDND0.0002140.0003110.00111EPTRACI 2.1kg N eq0.02280.0005810.00277ND0.00362ND0.0784NDNDNDND0.00004070.0002010.0435POCPTRACI 2.1kg O3 eq1.190.08550.00132ND0.0541ND3.83NDNDNDND0.005990.00410.0174Abbreviations:GWP = Global Warming Potential, 100 years (may also be denoted as GWP-total, GWP-fossil (fossil fuels), GWP-biogenic (biogenic sources), GWP-luluc (land use and land use change)), ODP = Ozone Depletion Potential, AP = Acidification Potential, EP = Eutrophication Potential, SFP = Smog Formation Potential, POCP = Photochemical oxidant creation potential, ADP-Fossil = Abiotic depletion potential for fossil resources, ADP-Minerals&Metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources, WDP = Water deprivation potential, PM = Particular Matter Emissions, IRP = Ionizing radiation, human health, ETP-fw = Eco-toxicity (freshwater), HTP-c = Human toxicity (cancer), HTP-nc = Human toxicity (non-cancer), SQP = Soil quality index.Comparisons cannot be made between product-specific or industry average EPDs at the design stage of a project, before a building has been specified. Comparisons may be made between product-specific or industry average EPDs at the time of product purchase when product performance and specifications have been established and serve as a functional unit for comparison. Environmental impact results shall be converted to a functional unit basis before any comparison is attempted. Any comparison of EPDs shall be subject to the requirements of ISO 21930 or EN 15804. EPDs are not comparative assertions and are either not comparable or have limited comparability when they have different system boundaries. EPDs are not comparative assertions and are either not comparable or have limited comparability when they have different system boundaries, are based on different product category rules or are missing relevant environmental impacts. Such comparison can be inaccurate, and could lead to erroneous selection of materials or products which are higher-impact, at least in some impact categories.Page 12 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.R�sourc� Us� Indicatorsper 1 m2.MarketIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4RPREMJ3.690.07340.00566ND0.544ND18.9NDNDNDND0.007710.0150.129RPRMMJ1.910.02870.00121ND4.46ND9.68NDNDNDND0.003010.003810.0269RPRTMJ5.60.1020.00686ND5ND28.5NDNDNDND0.01070.01880.156NRPREMJ1808.060.16ND13.8ND939NDNDNDND0.8473.193.31NRPRMMJ0.009920.0001160.0000114ND0.00189ND0.0502NDNDNDND0.00001220.00001240.000261NRPRTMJ1808.060.16ND13.8ND939NDNDNDND0.8473.193.31ADPFMJ22.61.130.0193ND1.49ND119NDNDNDND0.1190.4760.389FWm30.1130.0009090.000127ND0.0362ND0.571NDNDNDND0.00009550.0003160.00293Abbreviations:RPRE or PERE = Renewable primary resources used as energy carrier (fuel), RPRM or PERM = Renewable primary resources with energy content used as material, RPRT or PERT = Total use of renewable primary resources with energy content, NRPRE or PENRE = Non-renewable primary resources used as an energy carrier (fuel), NRPRM or PENRM = Non-renewable primary resources with energy content used as material, NRPRT or PENRT = Total non-renewable primary resources with energy content, SM: Secondary materials, RSF = Renewable secondary fuels, NRSF = Non-renewable secondary fuels, RE = Recovered energy, ADPF = Abiotic depletion potential, FW = Use of net freshwater resources, VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds.per 1 m2.TechIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4RPREMJ3.690.07340.00566ND0.544ND11.3NDNDNDND0.005140.009970.0861RPRMMJ1.910.02870.00121ND4.46ND5.81NDNDNDND0.002010.002540.0179RPRTMJ5.60.1020.00686ND5ND17.1NDNDNDND0.007150.01250.104NRPREMJ1808.060.16ND13.8ND564NDNDNDND0.5652.132.21NRPRMMJ0.009920.0001160.0000114ND0.00189ND0.0301NDNDNDND0.000008130.000008280.000174NRPRTMJ1808.060.16ND13.8ND564NDNDNDND0.5652.132.21ADPFMJ22.61.130.0193ND1.49ND71.1NDNDNDND0.07920.3170.26FWm30.1130.0009090.000127ND0.0362ND0.343NDNDNDND0.00006370.000210.00196Abbreviations:RPRE or PERE = Renewable primary resources used as energy carrier (fuel), RPRM or PERM = Renewable primary resources with energy content used as material, RPRT or PERT = Total use of renewable primary resources with energy content, NRPRE or PENRE = Non-renewable primary resources used as an energy carrier (fuel), NRPRM or PENRM = Non-renewable primary resources with energy content used as material, NRPRT or PENRT = Total non-renewable primary resources with energy content, SM: Secondary materials, RSF = Renewable secondary fuels, NRSF = Non-renewable secondary fuels, RE = Recovered energy, ADPF = Abiotic depletion potential, FW = Use of net freshwater resources, VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds.Page 13 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.Wast� and Output F�ow Indicatorsper 1 m2.MarketIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4HWDkg0.00627NDNDNDNDND0.0314NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNHWDkg0.113ND0.408NDNDND2.61NDNDNDNDNDND9.64Abbreviations:HWD = Hazardous waste disposed, NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed, RWD = Radioactive waste disposed, HLRW = High-level radioactive waste, ILLRW = Intermediate- and low-level radioactive waste, CRU = Components for re-use, MFR or MR = Materials for recycling, MER = Materials for energy recovery, MNER = Materials for incineration, no energy recovery, EE or EEE = Recovered energy exported from the product system, EET = Exported thermal energy.per 1 m2.TechIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4HWDkg0.00627NDNDNDNDND0.0188NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNHWDkg0.113ND0.408NDNDND1.56NDNDNDNDNDND6.43Abbreviations:HWD = Hazardous waste disposed, NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed, RWD = Radioactive waste disposed, HLRW = High-level radioactive waste, ILLRW = Intermediate- and low-level radioactive waste, CRU = Components for re-use, MFR or MR = Materials for recycling, MER = Materials for energy recovery, MNER = Materials for incineration, no energy recovery, EE or EEE = Recovered energy exported from the product system, EET = Exported thermal energy.Page 14 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.Carbon E�issions and R��ova�sper 1 m2.MarketIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4BCRPkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCEPkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCRKkg CO20.000868NDNDNDNDND0.00434NDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCEKkg CO2-0.000868NDNDNDNDND-0.00434NDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCEWkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDCCEkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDCCRkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDCWNRkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDAbbreviations:BCRP = Biogenic Carbon Removal from Product, BCEP = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Product, BCRK = Biogenic Carbon Removal from Packaging, BCEK = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Packaging, BCEW = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Combustion of Waste from Renewable Sources Used in Production Processes, CCE = Calcination Carbon Emissions, CCR = Carbonation Carbon Removals, CWNR = Carbon Emissions from Combustion of Waste from Non-Renewable Sources used in Production Processes, GWP-luc = Carbon Emissions from Land-use Change. per 1 m2.TechIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4BCRPkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCEPkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCRKkg CO20.000868NDNDNDNDND0.0026NDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCEKkg CO2-0.000868NDNDNDNDND-0.0026NDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCEWkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDCCEkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDCCRkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDCWNRkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDAbbreviations:BCRP = Biogenic Carbon Removal from Product, BCEP = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Product, BCRK = Biogenic Carbon Removal from Packaging, BCEK = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Packaging, BCEW = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Combustion of Waste from Renewable Sources Used in Production Processes, CCE = Calcination Carbon Emissions, CCR = Carbonation Carbon Removals, CWNR = Carbon Emissions from Combustion of Waste from Non-Renewable Sources used in Production Processes, GWP-luc = Carbon Emissions from Land-use Change. Page 15 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.Sc�nariosTransport to th� bui�ding/construction sit� (A4)A4 ModuleFu�� T�p�:DieselV�hic�� T�p�:Truck and TrailerTransport Distanc�:1.560e+03 kmCapacit� Uti�ization:33 %Packaging Mass:2.505e-01 kgGross d�nsit� of products transport�d:1.319e+03 kg/m3W�ight of products transport�d:1.640e+00 kgVo�u�� of products transport�d:1.243e-03 m3Capacit� uti�ization vo�u�� factor:1Assu�ptions for sc�nario d�v��op��nt:Transport distance includes finished product to distribution center and distribution center to point of sale.Insta��ation in to th� bui�ding/construction sit� (A5)A5 ModuleProduct Lost p�r Functiona� Unit:0.164 kgMass of Packaging Wast� Sp�cifi�d b� T�p�:0.2505 kgVOC E�issions:8496000000 ug/m3Assu�ptions for sc�nario d�v��op��nt: VOC T�st M�thod:ASTM D-2369R�f�r�nc� S�rvic� Lif�B1 ModuleRSL:60 YearsOutdoor Environ��nt: Indoor Environ��nt: Us� Conditions: Maint�nanc�: R�p�ac���nt (B4)B4 ModulePage 16 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.R�f�r�nc� S�rvic� Lif�:60 YearsR�p�ac���nt C�c��:5 (ESL/RSL)-1Furth�r assu�ptions for sc�nario d�v��op��nt:Product is assumed to be applied in an industrial environment. A market service lifetime and a technical service lifetime was adopted in the LCA model (see product specifications). Number of recoats is obtained by dividing the service lifetime. One initial coating application and subsequent recoats are required to maintain the average lifespan of a building, assumed to be 60 years.End of Lif�C1 - C4 ModulesCollection ProcessCo���ct�d with Mix�d Construction Wast�:1.64 kgRecoveryLandfi��:1.476 kgIncin�ration:0.164 kgAssu�ptions for sc�nario d�v��op��nt: Page 17 / 18

Po����r A��o� 2000SDDudick Inc.Int�rpr�tationManufacturing of Dudick Inc.'s products involves the direct procurement of raw materials from suppliers. These materials are then transported to Dudick Inc.'s manufacturing facilities where they are stored and mixed to produce the coatings. Notably, the product stage (stage 1) has the highest impact contribution, mainly attributed to the environmental impacts associated with raw material manufacturing.At the application site, coatings are spray or brush applied to various structural components to add a protective barrier to the concrete substrate. The use stage (stage 3) has a smaller contribution to the overall life cycle performance.For the analysis, It was assumed that Dudick's coatings require one initial coating application and multiple recoats to achieve the recommended service life of 60 years, aligning with the building's life cycle. The results were presented per one square meter of covered and protected substrate at a recommended coating thickness.The greatest contribution can be found in the use and maintenance stage due to the effect of the required repaints that will multiply the contribution of the product and design & construction stages together with the product application by the required number of recoats.For one single recoat, production stage, has the highest impact across all impact categories due mainly to the manufacture and transport of raw material, with some contribution of the manufacturing stage. At the application site, coatings are spray or brush applied to various exterior steel structural components to add a protective barrier to the steel substrate. This activity has a smaller contribution to the overall life cycle performance. End-of-life impacts are generally limited because most of the product is assumed to be landfilled, although impacts accumulate at each successive recoating.Given that the raw materials used in product manufacturing have the most significant impact, there are opportunities to substitute these materials with alternatives that have a lower environmental impact or to work with supplies in order to reduce impact along the supply chain.0%20%40%60%80%100% GWP-total ODP AP EP POCP Production (A1 - A3)Construction (A4 - A5)Us� (B1 - B7)End of Lif� (C1 - C4)Additiona� Environ��nta� Infor�ationBefore using this product, it is recommended that the operator read and follow all caution statements on the product data sheet and on the SDS for this product, and personal protective equipment must be used as directed.R�f�r�nc�s- ISO 14044, “Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines”, ISO14044:2006.- ISO 21930, “Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering worksCore rules for environmental product declarations of construction products and services”, ISO 21930:2017.- NSF International, Product Category Rule for Environmental Product Declarations for Resinous Floor Coatings, December 2018.- Bare, J. 2014. Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI) TRACI version 2.1 User’s Guide. US EPA Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-12/554, http://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P100HN53.pdf- ISO 14025, “Environmental labels and declarations, Type III environmental declarations, Principles and procedures”, ISO14025:2006- US Environmental Protection Agency. Waste Reduction Model (WARM). https://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/conserve/tools/warm/SWMGHGreport.html- Ryberg, M., Vieira, M.D.M., Zgola, M. et al. (2014). �Updated US and Canadian normalization factors for TRACI 2.1.’ Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 16: 329. doi:10.1007/s10098-013-0629-z- IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp, doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324- Ecoinvent v3.9.1, December 2022. The ecoinvent database: Overview and methodology, Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3, www.ecoin-vent.orgPage 18 / 18