Sealer 200 WB

Environmental Impact

Product Details

Description

Two-component waterborne urethane topcoat offering abrasion, UV, impact, and stain resistance. Easy soap and water cleanup.

Lifecycle Breakdown

Method: IPCC AR5 GWP 100 · 1.036798528 kgCO₂e/kg

EPD PDF Document

ENVIRONMENTALPRODUCT DECLARATIONIN ACCORDANCE WITH ISO 14025 AND ISO 21930:2017SmartEPD-2024-015-0090-01Sealer 200 WBDate of Issue:Mar 27, 2024Expiration:Mar 27, 2029Last updated:Aug 15, 2024

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.General Information3Reference Standards3Verification Information4Limitations, Liability, and Ownership4Organization Information4Product Information4Plants5Product Specifications5Material Composition5Software and LCI Data Sources6EPD Data Specificity6Renewable Electricity6System Boundary7Product Flow Diagram8Life Cycle Module Descriptions8LCA Discussion8Results10Environmental Impact Assessment10Resource Use Indicators12Waste and output Flow Indicators14Carbon Emissions and Removals16Scenarios17Transport to the building/construction site (A4)17Installation in to the building/construction site (A5)17Reference Service Life (B1)18Maintenance (B2)18Page 2 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.Replacement (B4)18End of Life (C1 - C4)18Interpretation19Additional Environmental Information20References20Page 3 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.General Information Dudick Inc. 1818 Miller Parkway, Streetsboro, OH 44241330-562-1970Anthony.Allegra@carboline.comdudick.comProduct Name:Sealer 200 WBFunctional Unit:1 m2 of covered and protected flooring surface for a period of 60 yearsDeclaration Number:SmartEPD-2024-015-0090-01Date of Issue:March 27, 2024Expiration:March 27, 2029Last updated:August 15, 2024EPD Scope:Cradle to graveA1 - A3, A4, A5, B1 - B7, C1 - C4 Market(s) of Applicability:North AmericaReference StandardsStandard(s): ISO 14025 and ISO 21930:2017PCR:NSF International PCR for Resinous Floor Coatings v.1eDate of issue: December 17, 2018Valid until: December 17, 2024PCR review panel:Contact Smart EPD for more information.General Program Instructions:Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.1.0, November 2022Page 4 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.Verification InformationLCA Author/Creator:Amy TorriParqamy@parqhq.comEPD Program Operator:Smart EPDinfo@smartepd.comwww.smartepd.com585 Grove St., Ste. 145 PMB 966, Herndon, VA 20170, USAVerification: Independent critical review of the LCA and data, according to ISO 14044 and ISO 14071 : External Anna LassoSmart EPDanna.lasso@smartepd.com Independent external verification of EPD, according to ISO 14025 and reference PCR(s) : External Anna LassoSmart EPDanna.lasso@smartepd.comLimitations, Liability, and Ownership In order to support comparative assertions, this EPD meets all comparability requirements stated in ISO 14025:2006. However, differences in certain assumptions, data quality, and variability between LCA data sets may still exist. As such, caution should be exercised when evaluating EPDs from different manufacturers or programs, as the EPD results may not be entirely comparable. Any EPD comparison must be carried out at the construction works level per ISO 21930:2017 guidelines. The results of this EPD reflect an average performance by the product and its actual impacts may vary on a case-to-case basis. The EPD owner shall have sole ownership, liability, and responsibility for the EPD. Organization Information For over fifty years, Dudick has been at the forefront of delivering cutting-edge product development alongside a wealth of technical expertise and experience, offering unparalleled chemical resistant coating solutions on a global scale. As a notable manufacturer of high performance resinous flooring and other coating products, Dudick is dedicated to showcasing its sustainability leadership while recognizing the business value in transparently reporting the comprehensive environmental impacts of its products, spanning from cradle to grave. For additional details on Dudick's product range, visit their website at https://www.dudick.com. Further information can be found at:https://www.dudick.comProduct Description Dudick’s Sealer 200 WB is a two component waterborne urethane coating that offers the abrasion resistance and toughness inherent of urethanes. It also provides excellent resistance to UV discoloration, impact and staining with easy soap and water cleanup. Further information can be found at:https://www.dudick.com/products/sealers/sealer-200wb/Product InformationFunctional Unit:1 m2 of covered and protected flooring surface for a period of 60 yearsMass:1.087 kgReference Service Life:60 YearsPage 5 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.Product Specificity:Product AverageProduct SpecificAveraging: Averaging was not conducted for this EPD. PlantsDudick - Streetsboro, OH1818 Miller Parkway, Streetsboro, OH, USAProduct SpecificationsProduct SKU(s):232DQ000902D, 232DQ000A1HD, 208D0910B0HDProduct Classification Codes:Masterformat - 09 67 00EC3 - Finishes -> Flooring -> OtherFlooringCoating Type:Thin mil floor coatingOptions:CommercialEstimated market service life:10 yearsEstimated technical service life:15 yearsMaterial CompositionMaterial/Component CategoryOrigin% MassHardenerUS50-95SolventUS15-30AdditiveUS0-5Packaging MaterialOriginkg MassSteel PailUS6.65E-2Plastic PailUS8.19E-2CardboardUS3.58E-2Page 6 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.Biogenic Carbon Contentkg C per m2 of cov-ered and protected floor-ing surface for a period of 60 yearsBiogenic carbon content in productNoneBiogenic carbon content in accompanying packaging0.0179Hazardous MaterialsHexane, 1,6-diisocyanato-, homopolymer (CAS 28182-81-2)Hydrophilic polyisocyante of HDI (CAS 666723-27-9)Hexamethylene-1,6-Diisocyanate (CAS 822-06-0)EPD Data SpecificityPrimary Data Year:2022-2023Manufacturing Specificity:Industry AverageManufacturer AverageFacility SpecificSoftware and LCI Data SourcesLCA Software:SimaPro v. 9.5LCI Foreground Database(s):Ecoinvent v. 3.9.1North Americacut-offLCI Background Database(s):Ecoinvent v. 3.9.1North Americacut-offRenewable ElectricityRenewable electricity is used:NoPage 7 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.System BoundaryProductionA1Raw material supplyA2TransportA3ManufacturingConstructionA4Transport to siteA5Assembly / InstallUseB1UseB2MaintenanceB3RepairB4ReplacementB5RefurbishmentB6Operational Energy UseB7Operational Water UseEnd of LifeC1DeconstructionC2TransportC3Waste ProcessingC4DisposalBenefits & Loads Beyond System BoundaryDRecycling, Reuse Recovery PotentialNDPage 8 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.Product Flow DiagramLife Cycle Module Descriptions The manufacturing of this product involves the direct procurement of raw materials from suppliers in module A1. These materials are then transported in module A2 to Dudick’s manufacturing facility in Streetsboro, OH, where they are stored and mixed to produce the coatings in module A3. Packaging waste associated the raw materials is recycled and/or send to landfill in Module A3. The coating is distributed and sold across North America in module A4. The product is applied to substrates to create a protective flooring surface in module A5.Use of the product consists of daily maintenance cleaning with a mop and a cleaning solution such as Hillyard SM-1® Industrial Cleaner Degreaser in module B2. Necessary recoats (re-applications) of the product to achieve service life are modeled in module B4 per the PCR. The plastic or steel can packaging is discarded to landfill and a 2% coating loss rate during application is assumed per the PCR (for both initial application and any recoats). End of life impacts include transport to disposal and final waste processing in modules C2 and C3, respectively, and landfilling of the substrate with applied coating in module C4, per the PCR. LCA Discussion Allocation Procedure Product packaging was allocated by mass. Manufacturing inputs requiring allocation were electricity and natural gas as the production of multiple products is measured using a single meter for each. The allocation of each was based on the percentage of production for the product in question divided by the total site production output. Cut-off Procedure The model includes over 95% of the total material mass, energy and environmental relevance throughout the product lifetime. Cut-off rules do not apply for hazardous or toxic materials, and the materials were included in the study. Page 9 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc. Data Quality Discussion The quality of inventory data is evaluated based on several criteria, including precision, completeness, consistency, and representativeness. Precision and Completeness • Precision: The inventory data used in this study were either directly measured, calculated, or estimated based on primary data sources, ensuring high precision. Background data from ecoinvent v3.9.1 database also has documented precision to the extent available. • Completeness: Each product system's mass balance and inventory completeness were thoroughly checked. Similar exclusions were made in line with the PCR requirements, as stated in the original Dudick LCA. However, no data was intentionally omitted. Consistency and Reproducibility • Consistency: Primary data were collected with a similar level of detail, while background data came from the ecoinvent v3.9.1 database. The modeling approach and other methodological choices were applied consistently throughout the model. Default values from the PCR were considered where there was unavailability of primary data, For example, the default waste transport distance was used for product disposal assessment. • Reproducibility: This study ensures reproducibility by providing comprehensive disclosure of input-output data, dataset choices, and modeling approaches. A knowledgeable third party should be able to approximate the results using the same data and modeling methods. Representativeness • Temporal: Primary data were collected for the one-year period of October 2022 to September 2023 to ensure the representativeness of post-consumer content. Secondary data from the ecoinvent v3.9.1 database is typically representative of recent years. • Geographical: Primary data represents Carboline’s production facility in Green Bay, WI and Dudick's production facility in Streetsboro, Ohio. Where applicable, differences in electric grid mix were considered using appropriate secondary data. The use of country-specific data ensures high geographical representativeness, and proxy data were only used when country-specific data were unavailable. Page 10 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.ResultsEnvironmental Impact Assessment ResultsTRACI 2.1, IPCC AR5 GWP 100per 1 m2 of covered and protected flooring surface for a period of 60 years.LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks.Commercial - Market Service LifeImpact Cate-goryMethodUnitA1A2A3A1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4ODPTRACI 2.1kg CFC 11 eq8e-82.25e-91.57e-98.381999999999999-e-81.16e-91.28e-11ND1.09e-8ND4.25e-7NDNDNDND1.09e-105.38e-104.42e-10APTRACI 2.1kg SO2 eq0.003520.001050.0002810.0048510.0003760.00000507ND0.000716ND0.0262NDNDNDND0.00003550.00005160.000183EPTRACI 2.1kg N eq0.001230.00007150.00007020.00137170.00003160.0000339ND0.000255ND0.00719NDNDNDND0.000002990.000004860.00146POCPTRACI 2.1kg O3 eq0.04340.02620.003880.073479999999999990.01050.0000898ND0.00766ND0.42NDNDNDND0.0009930.0006790.00288GWP-fossilIPCC AR5 GWP 100kg CO2 eq0.8390.1370.11.0760.07030.00151ND0.131ND5.74NDNDNDND0.006620.07880.0586GWP-totalIPCC AR5 GWP 100kg CO2 eq0.8720.1380.1171.1270.07070.0205ND0.145ND6.09NDNDNDND0.006660.07880.877Abbreviations:GWP = Global Warming Potential, 100 years (may also be denoted as GWP-total, GWP-fossil (fossil fuels), GWP-biogenic (biogenic sources), GWP-luluc (land use and land use change)), ODP = Ozone Depletion Potential, AP = Acidification Potential, EP = Eutrophication Potential, SFP = Smog Formation Potential, POCP = Photochemical oxidant creation potential, ADP-Fossil = Abiotic depletion potential for fossil resources, ADP-Minerals&Metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources, WDP = Water deprivation potential, PM = Particular Matter Emissions, IRP = Ionizing radiation, human health, ETP-fw = Eco-toxicity (freshwater), HTP-c = Human toxicity (cancer), HTP-nc = Human toxicity (non-cancer), SQP = Soil quality index.Page 11 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.per 1 m2 of covered and protected flooring surface for a period of 60 years.Commercial - Technical Service LifeImpact Cate-goryMethodUnitA1A2A3A1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4ODPTRACI 2.1kg CFC 11 eq8e-82.25e-91.57e-98.381999999999999-e-81.16e-91.28e-11ND1.09e-8ND2.55e-7NDNDNDND7.28e-113.59e-102.95e-10APTRACI 2.1kg SO2 eq0.003520.001050.0002810.0048510.0003760.00000507ND0.000716ND0.0157NDNDNDND0.00002370.00003440.000122EPTRACI 2.1kg N eq0.001230.00007150.00007020.00137170.00003160.0000339ND0.000255ND0.00432NDNDNDND0.000001990.000003240.00097POCPTRACI 2.1kg O3 eq0.04340.02620.003880.073479999999999990.01050.0000898ND0.00766ND0.252NDNDNDND0.0006620.0004530.00192GWP-fossilIPCC AR5 GWP 100kg CO2 eq0.8390.1370.11.0760.07030.00151ND0.131ND3.44NDNDNDND0.004410.05250.0391GWP-totalIPCC AR5 GWP 100kg CO2 eq0.8720.1380.1171.1270.07070.0205ND0.145ND3.65NDNDNDND0.004440.05260.585Abbreviations:GWP = Global Warming Potential, 100 years (may also be denoted as GWP-total, GWP-fossil (fossil fuels), GWP-biogenic (biogenic sources), GWP-luluc (land use and land use change)), ODP = Ozone Depletion Potential, AP = Acidification Potential, EP = Eutrophication Potential, SFP = Smog Formation Potential, POCP = Photochemical oxidant creation potential, ADP-Fossil = Abiotic depletion potential for fossil resources, ADP-Minerals&Metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources, WDP = Water deprivation potential, PM = Particular Matter Emissions, IRP = Ionizing radiation, human health, ETP-fw = Eco-toxicity (freshwater), HTP-c = Human toxicity (cancer), HTP-nc = Human toxicity (non-cancer), SQP = Soil quality index.Comparisons cannot be made between product-specific or industry average EPDs at the design stage of a project, before a building has been specified. Comparisons may be made between product-specific or industry average EPDs at the time of product purchase when product performance and specifications have been established and serve as a functional unit for comparison. Environmental impact results shall be converted to a functional unit basis before any comparison is attempted. Any comparison of EPDs shall be subject to the requirements of ISO 21930 or EN 15804. EPDs are not comparative assertions and are either not comparable or have limited comparability when they have different system boundaries. EPDs are not comparative assertions and are either not comparable or have limited comparability when they have different system boundaries, are based on different product category rules or are missing relevant environmental impacts. Such comparison can be inaccurate, and could lead to erroneous selection of materials or products which are higher-impact, at least in some impact categories.Page 12 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.Resource Use Indicatorsper 1 m2 of covered and protected flooring surface for a period of 60 years.Commercial - Market Service LifeIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4PEREMJ, net calorific value0.4120.01760.07260.50220.009060.000351ND0.081ND2.56NDNDNDND0.0008520.001650.0143PERMMJ, net calorific value0.2350.007210.02370.265910.003530.0000766ND0.671ND1.35NDNDNDND0.0003330.0004210.00297PERTMJ, net calorific value0.6480.02490.09630.76920000000000010.01260.000428ND0.752ND3.91NDNDNDND0.001180.002070.0172PENREMJ, net calorific value151.891.8918.780.9930.0107ND2.02ND99NDNDNDND0.09360.3530.366PENRMMJ, net calorific value0.001020.00002910.0001530.00120210.00001467.02e-7ND0.000283ND0.00607NDNDNDND0.000001350.000001370.0000289PENRTMJ, net calorific value151.891.8918.780.9930.0107ND2.02ND99NDNDNDND0.09360.3530.366ADPFMJ, net calorific value1.80.2660.2312.29699999999999970.1390.0013ND0.216ND12.2NDNDNDND0.01310.05260.043SMkgNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDRSFMJ, net calorific valueNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNRSFMJ, net calorific valueNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDREMJNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDFWm30.01350.000210.0004570.0141670.0001120.00000777ND0.00421ND0.0715NDNDNDND0.00001060.00003490.000324Abbreviations:RPRE or PERE = Renewable primary resources used as energy carrier (fuel), RPRM or PERM = Renewable primary resources with energy content used as material, RPRT or PERT = Total use of renewable primary resources with energy content, NRPRE or PENRE = Non-renewable primary resources used as an energy carrier (fuel), NRPRM or PENRM = Non-renewable primary resources with energy content used as material, NRPRT or PENRT = Total non-renewable primary resources with energy content, SM: Secondary materials, RSF = Renewable secondary fuels, NRSF = Non-renewable secondary fuels, RE = Recovered energy, ADPF = Abiotic depletion potential, FW = Use of net freshwater resources, VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds.Page 13 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.per 1 m2 of covered and protected flooring surface for a period of 60 years.Commercial - Technical Service LifeIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4PEREMJ, net calorific value0.4120.01760.07260.50220.009060.000351ND0.081ND1.54NDNDNDND0.0005680.00110.00952PERMMJ, net calorific value0.2350.007210.02370.265910.003530.0000766ND0.671ND0.809NDNDNDND0.0002220.0002810.00198PERTMJ, net calorific value0.6480.02490.09630.76920000000000010.01260.000428ND0.752ND2.35NDNDNDND0.000790.001380.0115PENREMJ, net calorific value151.891.8918.780.9930.0107ND2.02ND59.4NDNDNDND0.06240.2350.244PENRMMJ, net calorific value0.001020.00002910.0001530.00120210.00001467.02e-7ND0.000283ND0.00364NDNDNDND8.98e-79.15e-70.0000193PENRTMJ, net calorific value151.891.8918.780.9930.0107ND2.02ND59.4NDNDNDND0.06240.2350.244ADPFMJ, net calorific value1.80.2660.2312.29699999999999970.1390.0013ND0.216ND7.3NDNDNDND0.008750.0350.0287SMkgNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDRSFMJ, net calorific valueNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNRSFMJ, net calorific valueNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDREMJNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDFWm30.01350.000210.0004570.0141670.0001120.00000777ND0.00421ND0.0429NDNDNDND0.000007040.00002330.000216Abbreviations:RPRE or PERE = Renewable primary resources used as energy carrier (fuel), RPRM or PERM = Renewable primary resources with energy content used as material, RPRT or PERT = Total use of renewable primary resources with energy content, NRPRE or PENRE = Non-renewable primary resources used as an energy carrier (fuel), NRPRM or PENRM = Non-renewable primary resources with energy content used as material, NRPRT or PENRT = Total non-renewable primary resources with energy content, SM: Secondary materials, RSF = Renewable secondary fuels, NRSF = Non-renewable secondary fuels, RE = Recovered energy, ADPF = Abiotic depletion potential, FW = Use of net freshwater resources, VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds.Page 14 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.Waste and Output Flow Indicatorsper 1 m2 of covered and protected flooring surface for a period of 60 years.Commercial - Market Service LifeIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4HWDkg0.0002330.00004410.0007690.00104610000000000010.00002470.0000189ND0.000108ND0.00545NDNDNDND0.000002330.000007850.000811NHWDkg0.09490.07910.03340.207399999999999970.04770.0249ND0.0164ND1.4NDNDNDND0.00450.001911.07RWDkg0.000009383.89e-70.000001170.0000109390000000000012.01e-78.07e-9ND0.00000216ND0.0000557NDNDNDND1.88e-83.45e-83.29e-7CRUkgNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDMFRkgNDND0.009570.00957NDNDNDNDND0.0479NDNDNDNDNDNDNDMERkgNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDEEEMJNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDEETMJNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDAbbreviations:HWD = Hazardous waste disposed, NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed, RWD = Radioactive waste disposed, HLRW = High-level radioactive waste, ILLRW = Intermediate- and low-level radioactive waste, CRU = Components for re-use, MFR or MR = Materials for recycling, MER = Materials for energy recovery, MNER = Materials for incineration, no energy recovery, EE or EEE = Recovered energy exported from the product system, EET = Exported thermal energy.Significant data limitations currently exist within the LCI data used to generate waste metrics for Life Cycle Assessments and Environmental Product Declarations. The waste metrics were calculated in a way conformant with the requirements of ISO 21930:2017, but these values represent rough estimates and are for informational purposes only. As such, no decisions regarding actual cradle-grave waste performance between products should be derived from these reported values.Page 15 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.per 1 m2 of covered and protected flooring surface for a period of 60 years.Commercial - Technical Service LifeIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4HWDkg0.0002330.00004410.0007690.00104610000000000010.00002470.0000189ND0.000108ND0.00327NDNDNDND0.000001560.000005240.000541NHWDkg0.09490.07910.03340.207399999999999970.04770.0249ND0.0164ND0.84NDNDNDND0.0030.001280.713RWDkg0.000009383.89e-70.000001170.0000109390000000000012.01e-78.07e-9ND0.00000216ND0.0000334NDNDNDND1.26e-82.3e-82.19e-7CRUkgNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDMFRkgNDND0.009570.00957NDNDNDNDND0.0287NDNDNDNDNDNDNDMERkgNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDEEEMJNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDEETMJNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDAbbreviations:HWD = Hazardous waste disposed, NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed, RWD = Radioactive waste disposed, HLRW = High-level radioactive waste, ILLRW = Intermediate- and low-level radioactive waste, CRU = Components for re-use, MFR or MR = Materials for recycling, MER = Materials for energy recovery, MNER = Materials for incineration, no energy recovery, EE or EEE = Recovered energy exported from the product system, EET = Exported thermal energy.Significant data limitations currently exist within the LCI data used to generate waste metrics for Life Cycle Assessments and Environmental Product Declarations. The waste metrics were calculated in a way conformant with the requirements of ISO 21930:2017, but these values represent rough estimates and are for informational purposes only. As such, no decisions regarding actual cradle-grave waste performance between products should be derived from these reported values.Page 16 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.Carbon Emissions and Removalsper 1 m2 of covered and protected flooring surface for a period of 60 years.Commercial - Market Service LifeIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4BCRPkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCEPkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCRKkg CO2NDND-0.0142-0.0142NDNDNDNDND-0.0711NDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCEKkg CO2NDND0.01420.0142NDNDNDNDND0.0711NDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCEWkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDCCEkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDCCRkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDCWNRkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDAbbreviations:BCRP = Biogenic Carbon Removal from Product, BCEP = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Product, BCRK = Biogenic Carbon Removal from Packaging, BCEK = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Packaging, BCEW = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Combustion of Waste from Renewable Sources Used in Production Processes, CCE = Calcination Carbon Emissions, CCR = Carbonation Carbon Removals, CWNR = Carbon Emissions from Combustion of Waste from Non-Renewable Sources used in Production Processes, GWP-luc = Carbon Emissions from Land-use Change.per 1 m2 of covered and protected flooring surface for a period of 60 years.Commercial - Technical Service LifeIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A1A2A3A4A5B1B2B3B4B5B6B7C1C2C3C4BCRPkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCEPkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCRKkg CO2NDND-0.0142-0.0142NDNDNDNDND-0.0426NDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCEKkg CO2NDND0.01420.0142NDNDNDNDND0.0426NDNDNDNDNDNDNDBCEWkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDCCEkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDCCRkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDCWNRkg CO2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDAbbreviations:BCRP = Biogenic Carbon Removal from Product, BCEP = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Product, BCRK = Biogenic Carbon Removal from Packaging, BCEK = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Packaging, BCEW = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Combustion of Waste from Renewable Sources Used in Production Processes, CCE = Calcination Carbon Emissions, CCR = Carbonation Carbon Removals, CWNR = Carbon Emissions from Combustion of Waste from Non-Renewable Sources used in Production Processes, GWP-luc = Carbon Emissions from Land-use Change.Page 17 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.ScenariosTransport to the building/construction site (A4)A4 ModuleFuel Type:DieselVehicle Type: Truck and TrailerTransport Distance:1196 kmCapacity Utilization:33 %Packaging Mass:0.184 kgGross density of products transported:1019 kg/m3Weight of products transported:1.087 kgVolume of products transported:0.001 m3Capacity utilization volume factor:1Assumptions for scenario development:Transport distance includes finished product to distribution center and distribution center to point of sale.- Passenger van assumed for point of sale to application site, with a distance of 8km using same packaging and capacity assumptions.Installation in to the building/construction site (A5)A5 ModuleProduct Lost per Functional Unit:0.022 kgMass of Packaging Waste Specified by Type:0.184 kgBiogenic Carbon Contained in Packaging:0.0179 kgVOC Emissions:85000000000 ug/m3VOC Test Method:ASTM D-2369Page 18 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.Reference Service LifeB1 ModuleRSL:60 YearsDeclared Product Properties:Designed to provide excellent resistance to UV discoloration, impact and staining with easy soap and water cleanup. It also provides excellent adhesion and excellent chemical & abrasion resistance. This product is available as a two component system.Design Application Parameters:Brush-rolling is the preferred method of application. Substrate temperature for metal must be between 50°F and 90°F. Relative humidity must not exceed 90%. Substrate temperature must be 5°F above the dew point. Application of the product in direct sunlight may lead to blistering, pinholes, or wrinkling due to outgassing of air in the concrete and high substrate temperatures. This product requires pre-mixing of components separately and combining them at the site of application. Cure cycle is temperature-dependent. Consult product technical data sheet for detailed application parameters. Consult a Dudick representative.An Assumed Quality of Work, When Installed in Accordance with The Manufacturer’s Instructions:Long term protection is achieved when installed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. Theoretical coverage is 802 ft2/gal at 3-4 mils.Maintenance: Maintenance (B2)B2 ModuleMaintenance Cycle:60 Cycles/RSL60 Cycles/ESLMaintenance Process Information:Daily mopping with a cleaning solution such as Hillyard SM-1® Industrial Cleaner Degreaser, at a ratio of 1/2 cup cleaning solution to 1 gallon of mop water, is included as a required maintenance activity per the PCR.Replacement (B4)B4 ModuleReference Service Life:10 YearsReplacement Cycle:5 (ESL/RSL)-1Further assumptions for scenario development:Product is assumed to be applied in an industrial environment. A 10 year market service lifetime and a 15 year technical service lifetime was adopted in the LCA model. For the market service-based lifetime, one initial coating application and 5 recoats are required to maintain the average lifespan of a building, assumed to be 60 years. For the technical service-based lifetime, one initial coating application and 3 recoats are required to maintain the 60 year building lifespan.End of LifeC1 - C4 ModulesCollection ProcessCollected Separately:0.022 kgCollected with Mixed Construction Waste:1.065 kgRecoveryPage 19 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc.Landfill:1.065 kgIncineration:0.022 kgDisposalProduct or Material for Final Disposal:1.087 kgAssumptions for scenario development:The US EPA WARM model was used to determine the processes used to dispose of waste materials (coatings at the end of life in demolition waste) and unused product.Interpretation Data was collected for 12 month periods spanning calendar years 2022 and 2023 to ensure the representativeness of business activities and post-consumer materials. Manufacturing data represents Dudick’s production facility in Streetsboro, Ohio. Secondary data was obtained from ecoinvent v3.9.1, representing the most recent years available. The overall quality of the data used is considered representative of the product systems. The system boundary is cradle to grave, excluding: construction of major capital equipment; research and development activities; point of sale infrastructure; coating applicator and its maintenance and operation; human labor and employee transport; raw material, forming, and disposal impacts from secondary/tertiary packaging; disposal of packaging materials not associated with final product; impacts associated with tool (mop) required for maintenance cleaning; building operational energy and water use; deconstruction and demolition. Overall, the replacement module of the use stage (B4), has the highest impact across all impact categories followed by the production stage, specifically module A1. Use stage accounts for approximately 60% to 90% of the total impact in all the impact categories depending on the design life. Note that the B4 module includes the A1-A5 modules for each recoat required for the product’s lifetime. The upstream raw material phase (A1) is the primary contributor to all impact categories. This is largely due to the number of different raw material processes required to produce the product. The production stage (A1-A3) contributes to around 10% to 25% of the total emissions in all the impact categories, where the major impact is from raw material extraction and processing of secondary input materials stage (A1). The construction stage (A4-A5), includes the transportation of the product from manufacturing to the customer. They account for less than 3% of the total emissions in almost all the impact categories. The transportation miles from the point of sale to the application site (A4) account for low impacts across all impact categories. Installation (A5) is the primary driver in this stage for environmental impacts due to disposal of product packaging waste. The use phase includes maintenance cleaning and recoats of the product. Product maintenance provides marginal contribution to the overall impact categories. As mentioned above, the replacement module (B4) is the primary impact driver for all the products. In end-of-life phase (C2-C4), disposal contributes the highest to eutrophication and global warming with biogenic carbon. Transportation to the disposal point phase (C2) has a relatively small contribution to all product life cycle impacts. Limitations are as follows: • The study is only applicable to the defined scenarios. • Environmental declarations from different programs may not be comparable (ISO 14025:2006). Even when the same PCR is followed, different LCA software and background LCI datasets may lead to different results for upstream or downstream of the life cycle stages declared. • With the current availability of data, it is nearly impossible to follow the entire supply chain associated with the product in a company-specific way. Many of the processes within the supply chains are modeled using average industry data with varying amounts of specificity (e.g., data on a more-or-less specific technology or region). This makes it difficult to accurately determine how well the unit process data represents the actual factors in the products’ life cycle. • Primary data was modeled based on information provided by Carboline, supplemented by data from technical and safety data sheets. Proxy materials were used when suitable secondary data sets were not available. • Material input and transportation distances are presented as averages and may not account for variations in material efficiency and supplier locations. • While generic data sets used for material inputs, transport, and waste processing are of good quality, actual impacts from material suppliers, transport carriers, and local waste processing may differ. • Datasets used in some instances were older than 10 years, but were judged best representation available. • The impact assessment methodology categories do not encompass all potential environmental impact categories. • Characterization factors used within the impact assessment methodology may entail varying levels of uncertainty. • LCA results are expressed relatively and should not be interpreted as predicting impacts on specific environmental categories, exceeding thresholds, safety margins, or risks. Page 20 / 21

Sealer 200 WBDudick Inc. The overall data quality assessment score is judged to be "good". This judgement includes an assessment of "good" for the modeling of technology (primary drivers of model emissions are modeled using the same or similar but different technology), "fair" for time representation (dominant emissions sources are primarily within 10 years of age), and "good" for geography, completeness, and reliability, which are based on comprehensive primary data collection. 0%20%40%60%80%100% ODP AP EP POCP GWP-fossil GWP-total Production (A1 - A3)Construction (A4 - A5)Use (B1 - B7)End of Life (C1 - C4)Additional Environmental Information Before using this product, it is recommended that the operator read and follow all caution statements on the product data sheet and on the SDS for this product, and personal protective equipment must be used as directed. References [1] ISO 14040:2006/Amd 1:2020, “Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework”. [2] ISO 14044:2006/Amd 1:2017/Amd 2:2020, “Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines”. [3] ISO 21930:2017, “Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works - Core rules for environmental product declarations of construction products and services”. [4] NSF International, Product Category Rule for Environmental Product Declarations for Resinous Floor Coatings, December 2018. [5] ISO 14025:2006, “Environmental labels and declarations - Type III environmental declarations - Principles and procedures”. [6] Bare, J. 2014. Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI) TRACI version 2.1 User’s Guide. US EPA Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-12/554, http://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P100HN53.pdf [7] IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/ [8] ecoinvent v3.9.1, December 2022, https://ecoinvent.org/the-ecoinvent-database/data-releases/ecoinvent-3-9-1/ [9] US Environmental Protection Agency Waste Reduction Model (WARM) v15, September 2022, https://www.epa.gov/warm/versions-waste-reduction-mod-el-warm#15 [10] Ryberg, M., M. Vieira, M. Zgola, et al. Updated US and Canadian Normalization Factors for TRACI 2.1. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY. Springer, New York, NY, 16(2):329-339 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0629-z [11] Weidema B. P., C. Bauer, R. Hischier, et al. Overview and methodology. Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. Ecoinvent Report 1(v3), St. Gallen: The ecoinvent Centre (2013). https://ecoinvent.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/dataqualityguideline_ecoinvent_3_20130506.pdf [12] Facts and figures about materials, waste and recycling (2018). https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling. [13] Dudick, Inc., Internal Report, Life Cycle Assessment of Select Dudick Chemical Resistant Coatings, December 2023 [14] Dudick, Inc., Internal Report, Amendment to Life Cycle Assessment of Select Dudick Chemical Resistant Coatings for for Steri-Flor UV, Primer 67/Steri-Prime, Sealer 200 WB, and Carboseal 985, March 2024 Page 21 / 21